- 
                            Key: UPDM-363
 - 
                            Legacy Issue Number: 12010
 - 
                            Status: open
 - 
                            Source: Anonymous
 - 
                            Summary:
· MODAF/ NAF does not contain a system node concept and the question is whether a more applicable concept here would not be CapabilityConfiguration. The statement that a system node would be equivalent to PhysicalAsset in MODAF is not correct. If however there is a hidden assumption that a systems node has to be in a single location, then Capability configuration is broader since this would not be a requirement.
· It is considered questionable whether the association extension is really required. A CapabilityConfiguration (to use a MODAF/ NAF term) would be visualised as a composite class diagram and the entities would thus turn up as connected to the surrounding entity without the need of a specific association. - 
                            Reported: UPDM 1.0b1 — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:00 GMT
 - 
                            Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:59 GMT