-
Key: SYSML17-645
-
Status: open
-
Source: Eclectica Systems Ltd ( Nic Plum)
-
Summary:
Within the document there appears to be no usable link or definition of Satisy [another implementation artefact] and no definition of a Requirement element or other relationships linked to Requirement (Trace, Verify, Refine).
Figure 8:86 multiplicities don't look to be consistent - 0..1 on Trace but 1 on Satisfy. Trace looks to be wrong - think someone trying to describe Requirement traces to Requirement, UAFELement traces to UAFElement and UAFElement traces to Requirement but there is no identification of path and its ambigous or wrong.
Why is Requirement not a UAF Element? If it's not why is it even in this specification? Again I suspect this is an implementation artefact - someone thinking of a SysML::Requirement (which is an implementation of the DMM)
-
Reported: SysML 1.5 — Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:29 GMT
-
Updated: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 15:21 GMT
SYSML17 — Figure 9:134 / 8:86 Undefined DMM Elements - Refine, Trace, Refine, Verifiy, Requirement. Requirement not a UAF Element?
- Key: SYSML17-645
- OMG Task Force: SysML 1.7 RTF