SPTP 1.0 NO IDEA Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

SPTP — SAStep issue

Open Closed All
  • Key: SPTP-92
  • Legacy Issue Number: 5059
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Anonymous
  • Summary:

    If we include SAStep in the objects to represent the messages sequences we will not respect the method used in UML 1.3, because the element stereotyped are the objects and not the messages, and we can not use the sequence activator-predecessor to define the response sequence with steps associated to objects. Another problem: If we associate more than one SAStep to the object, who defines the order? we need some kind of tagged value in the stereotype to do this.
  • Reported: SPTP 1.0b1 — Wed, 20 Mar 2002 05:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — SPTP 1.0
  • Disposition Summary:

    Closed, no change
  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT