SPTP 1.0 NO IDEA Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

SPTP — Scheduling and Performance sub-profiles do not give details

  • Key: SPTP-178
  • Legacy Issue Number: 4845
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Universidad Politecnica de Madrid ( Miguel de Miguel)
  • Summary:

    Scheduling and Performance sub-profiles do not give details for the identification of behaviors from UML models. This is especially important in performance and scheduling analysis. They do not restrict the UML behavior models (e.g. collaboration diagrams, activity diagrams and state diagrams, sequence diagrams), and sometimes some types of models are not analyzable (e.g. loops in state and activity diagrams are not directly analyzable with scheduling analysis methods). Because of this, different mappings from UML models to analysis domain models can provide different analysis results or not classify consistent the same models. The profile do not provides restrictions and guidelines of mappings from message sequences, stimulus sequences, and state and activity transitions to scheduling domain models.

  • Reported: SPTP 1.0b1 — Thu, 7 Feb 2002 05:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — SPTP 1.0
  • Disposition Summary:

    Closed, no change

  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:59 GMT