SPTP 1.0 NO IDEA Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

SPTP — "Position regarding Action Language Semantics Work

  • Key: SPTP-175
  • Legacy Issue Number: 4842
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Commissariat a l Energie Atomique-CEA ( Dr. Sebastien Gerard)
  • Summary:

    "Position regarding Action Language Semantics Work
    I think that some concepts introduced in the SPT profile are closed, even similar, to ones introduced in the Action Semantics Language profile. For example: Is the concept of action introduced in SPT consistent with this one introduced in ASL? In fact, action definition is the core issue of ASL profile. So my opinion is that it would be better to reuse the ASL concepts as much as possible instead of introducing additional one?
    These two profiles are know almost mature and then are going to be standardized. Moreover, both are going to be very useful for real-time system area: SPT by nature, and ASL because it will allow to build full executable UML models. So it is very important these two profiles to be coherent. Then I think it could be a good think to take some times to synchronize both woks before standardizing them.

  • Reported: SPTP 1.0b1 — Thu, 7 Feb 2002 05:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — SPTP 1.0
  • Disposition Summary:

    Closed, no change

  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:59 GMT