-
Key: SPTP-111
-
Legacy Issue Number: 5079
-
Status: closed
-
Source: International Business Machines ( Morgan Bjorkander)
-
Summary:
The concepts described in the beginning of each section in terms of a class model are later transposed in terms of stereotypes. But how are the association from the initial class model reflected in the stereotypes (which are, as I understand, the only normative part of the profile)?For example, a Resource has a set of offered QoS characteristics. How is the connection between a user <<GRMressource>> class and its corresponding <<GRMqosCharacteristics>> made in the user's model?The same question holds for all other associations. In some cases the connection is obvious informally: for example in case of a user class stereotyped with <<GRMresource>>, whose operations are stereotyped with<<GRMresourceService>>, it is clear that the operations represent the services of the resource represented by the user class. But that link is not captured formally by the metamodel / stereotype definition
-
Reported: SPTP 1.0b1 — Wed, 20 Mar 2002 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — SPTP 1.0
-
Disposition Summary:
see below
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
SPTP — how are the association from the initial class model reflected in the stere
- Key: SPTP-111
- OMG Task Force: UML Profile for Scheduling FTF