SACM 1.0 FTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

SACM_ — Association names should be nouns

Open Closed All
  • Key: SACM_-1
  • Legacy Issue Number: 17369
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Adelard LLP ( Luke Emmet)
  • Summary:

    Applies to: Sysa/10-03-15, section 8.1

    Title: Association names should be nouns

    Detail: The association names between classes in ARM should be labelled
    with nouns. This will better conform to the OMG naming recommendations.

  • Reported: SACM 1.0b2 — Tue, 15 May 2012 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — SACM 1.0
  • Disposition Summary:

    Update the document as follows, assuming resolution for issue 17347 has already been applied
    Argumentation class (was previously 9.2.3, and has been renamed from Argument by other edits),
    Association
    “containsArgumentelement:ArgumentElement[0..*]” -> “argumentElement:ArgumentElement[0..*]”
    “containsArgumentation:Argumentation[0..*]” -> “argumentation:Argumentation[0..*]”
    CitationElement class (previously 9.2.8), Associations
    “refersToArgumentelement:ArgumentElement[0..1]” ->
    “argumentElementReference:ArgumentElement[0..1]”
    “refersToArgument:Argument[0..1]” -> “argumentationReference:Argumentation[0..1]”
    ArgumentReasoning class (previously 9.2.11), Associations
    “hasStructure:Argument[0..1]” -> “structure:Argument[0..1]”
    “describes:AssertedInference [0..*]” -> “describedInference:AssertedInference [0..*]”
    Replace figure 9.1 with the following << figure on p 129 of ptc/2012-06-04>>
  • Updated: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 13:50 GMT