PSS 1.0 NO IDEA Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

PSS — New PSS Issue: Private state members

  • Key: PSS-27
  • Legacy Issue Number: 4042
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Anonymous
  • Summary:

    In the PSDL grammar of the Persistent State Service, orbos/99-07-07,
    state members are merely declared. This makes all such members
    inherently public. What is the rationale behind public-only state
    members? Since storage objects are almost the same as valuetypes, it
    seems an obvious extension that any object, persistent or not, might
    have members that should not be exposed to external objects or even
    derived types. Could this syntax be changed to more closely resemble
    valuetypes? (See also issue 3226 on factory declarators and the
    (currently unnumbered) issues on scoping and grammar complexity.)

  • Reported: PSS 1.0b1 — Tue, 14 Nov 2000 05:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — PSS 1.0
  • Disposition Summary:


  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT