PIDS 1.1 NO IDEA Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

PIDS11 — The spec is not clear enough on How to Handle Links

  • Key: PIDS11-4
  • Legacy Issue Number: 2093
  • Status: open  
  • Source: Anonymous
  • Summary:

    Summary: The spec is not clear enough on How to Handle Links

    Based on clear feedback in HL7 forums, I know there is serious concern
    over the fact that our Interfaces and info model show explicit support
    for merges (merges deactivate one dupe and leave another intact) but
    only implicit support for links (links leave multiple intact; In
    effect, they simply assert or "record" dupes).

    I find the last paragraph of 2.7 confusing: If PIDS implementations are
    to be able to "carry administrative and auditing attributes such as
    timestamp, user stamp, source system, and specific operation types",
    then it raises thevalid question: how does the implementation know when
    a link operation has occurred? We do not tell them anywhere in the spec
    as it stands.

  • Reported: PIDS 1.0b1 — Fri, 16 Oct 1998 04:00 GMT
  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:50 GMT