-
Key: IDL43-101
-
Status: open
-
Source: Remedy IT ( Johnny Willemsen)
-
Summary:
Some text for the annotations refers to element, but the introduction in 8.3.1 says "They may be applied on almost all kinds of elements", but what is an element. It looks for example logical that optional/value/min/max/unit/range can also be applied to a typedef, for example "@optional typedef boolean opt_bool1;". In a DDS world these annotations are mostly only used for types, but with CORBA/LwCCM adding them to a typedef could also mean that for example a optional is passed with a method call.
The spec should be more precise whether applying annotations to a typedef is legal.
-
Reported: IDL 4.2 — Fri, 9 Aug 2024 12:33 GMT
-
Updated: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:28 GMT
IDL43 — Using annotations for typedef allowed?
- Key: IDL43-101
- OMG Task Force: Interface Definition Language 4.3 RTF