I2JAV12 — Should a holder class for ProtectingEntity get generated

>There is something that is unclear in your CORBA spec that I think is causing
incompatibility problems between various IDL compilers.
>> >
>> >Given the following IDL:
>> >
>> >-------------------------------------------------
>> >struct Protection
>> >

;
>> >
>> >typedef Protection ProtectedEntity;
>> >
>> >typedef sequence<ProtectedEntity> ProtectedEntityList;
>> >
>> >typedef ProtectedEntityList ProtectingEntity;
>> >-------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >Should a holder class for ProtectingEntity get generated? I ask this because some IDL
compilers generate it and others do not (very frustrating!).
>> >
>> >In section 1.18.2 of the OMG IDL mapping document ptc/00-01-08 spec I found this:
"Holder classes are generated for sequence and array typedefs only. The "unwound" type's
Holder class is used for the other cases.".
>> >
>> >Since this is a typedef of a typedef, but the original item was a sequence, should the
ProtectingEntityHolder.java file get generated or not?

Incorporate change and close issue