-
Key: DDSXTY12-3
-
Legacy Issue Number: 19263
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Real-Time Innovations ( Sumant Tambe)
-
Summary:
The TypeId union declaration in Annex B is missing the value NO_TYPE as one possible discriminator. In addition, the use cases for the usage of that value are not documented.
Assuming that we add a TypeId paramater to the endpoint information in addition to the type object. See issue "Send TypeId independently of the TypeObject". In a situation in which no type object or type id paramaters are found, we could indicate that to the user by providing a NO_TYPE TypeId as part of the PublicationBuiltinTopicData or SubscriptionBuiltinTopicData. -
Reported: DDS-XTypes 1.1 — Wed, 26 Feb 2014 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Duplicate or Merged — DDS-XTypes 1.2
-
Disposition Summary:
Merged with
DDSXTY12-7Merged with issue
DDSXTY12-7, which adds NO_TYPE case in _TypeId union. -
Updated: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:42 GMT
DDSXTY12 — TypeId union is missing NO_TYPE from the possible values of the discriminator
- Key: DDSXTY12-3
- OMG Task Force: DDS-XTYPES 1.2 RTF