DDS-XTypes 1.2 RTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

DDSXTY12 — XML type description not orthogonal and not consistent

  • Key: DDSXTY12-26
  • Legacy Issue Number: 18302
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: ZettaScale Technology ( Erik Hendriks)
  • Summary:

    The XML description of a type seems cumbersome and not orthogonal. I have lots of questions regarding it. Why do we propose 2 separate XML representations (Valid and Well-formed) that both have obvious flaws instead of 1 XML representation that satisfies the requirements of both representations? PrismTech has written an extensive proposal on how represent the types in XML that is both valid, well-formed and orthogonal. I would propose to give that proposal a thought. (Can't attach the document to this ticket, but I will gladly make it available. Angelo also has access to that document

  • Reported: DDS-XTypes 1.1 — Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — DDS-XTypes 1.2
  • Disposition Summary:

    Clarified both xml data representations

    Resolutions applied: Added the revised text in section

  • Updated: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:42 GMT