-
Key: DDSXTY12-26
-
Legacy Issue Number: 18302
-
Status: closed
-
Source: ZettaScale Technology ( Mr. Erik Hendriks)
-
Summary:
The XML description of a type seems cumbersome and not orthogonal. I have lots of questions regarding it. Why do we propose 2 separate XML representations (Valid and Well-formed) that both have obvious flaws instead of 1 XML representation that satisfies the requirements of both representations? PrismTech has written an extensive proposal on how represent the types in XML that is both valid, well-formed and orthogonal. I would propose to give that proposal a thought. (Can't attach the document to this ticket, but I will gladly make it available. Angelo also has access to that document
-
Reported: DDS-XTypes 1.1 — Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — DDS-XTypes 1.2
-
Disposition Summary:
Clarified both xml data representations
Resolutions applied: Added the revised text in section 7.4.2.2
-
Updated: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:42 GMT
DDSXTY12 — XML type description not orthogonal and not consistent
- Key: DDSXTY12-26
- OMG Task Force: DDS-XTYPES 1.2 RTF