DDSSEC11 — dds_security_plugins_spis.idl has inheritance commented out

The inheritance relations for some of the structures dds_security_plugins_spis.idl appear in comments. See for example declaration of struct DomainParticipantQos:

        struct DomainParticipantQos { // : DomainParticipantQos {
            PropertyQosPolicy  property;
        }; //@Extensibility (MUTABLE_EXTENSIBILITY)
 

In addition the syntax for the annotations is the legacy "comment-style" rather that the more modern "annotation style".

To correct this the above declaration should be replaced with:

        @extensibility(MUTABLE)
        struct DomainParticipantQos : DDS::DomainParticipantQos {
            PropertyQosPolicy  property;
        }; 
 

The same kind of changes should be applied to other declarations in the IDL.

Use explicit inheritance for BuitinTopics

The issue is broader. The problem is that the syntax does not comply with IDL 4.1 or XTYPES 1.2.
In addition to the use of IDL inheritance, the syntax of the IDL should be updated to:
(1) Use the modern annotations @annotationName(anotationParam) rather than the syntax that places annotations in a comment
(2) Use the IDL4.1/XTYPES 1.2 annotation names which are all lower case
(3) Include http://www.omg.org/spec/DDS-XTypes/20170301/dds-xtypes_discovery.idl instead of dds_rtf2_dcps.idl this has more up-to-date definitions of the Qos and builtin topics.
(4) Add definition of DomainId_t which is not in dds-xtypes_discovery.idl
(5) Remove the keyword "local" ahead of interface declaration. In IDL41 "local" interfaces are in the CORBA building block.