-
Key: DDSPSMC11_-2
-
Status: open
-
Source: Real-Time Innovations ( Mr. Alejandro Campos)
-
Summary:
There are several reasons for this:
(1) The DDS-PIM defines the information in the SampleInfo as a "valid_data" flag therefore when mapped to the C++ PSM the same name should be retained.
(2) This is consistent with the other PSMs.
(3) Semantically SampleInfo::valid() is incorrect. The SampleInfo is always valid. What is invalid is the associated SampleData. Hence the correct name would be SampleInfo::valid_data()
-
Reported: DDS-PSM-Cxx 1.0b2 — Wed, 13 Jul 2016 23:07 GMT
-
Updated: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:27 GMT
DDSPSMC11_ — Method SampleInfo::valid() should be renamed SampleInfo::valid_data()
- Key: DDSPSMC11_-2
- OMG Task Force: DDS-PSM-Cxx v1.1 RTF