-
Key: CORBA24-68
-
Legacy Issue Number: 3220
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Floorboard Software ( Jonathan Biggar)
-
Summary:
Although legal in the CORBA 2.3 IDL grammar, creating a valuebox of
another valuebox or valuetype is of dubious use. I can't see why having
an extra level of indirection here would ever be useful. None of the
language mappings that have defined mappings for valuebox (C++, Java,
Ada) address this issue either.Does it make sense to disallow valueboxing valueboxes or valuetypes?
-
Reported: CORBA 2.3.1 — Sat, 15 Jan 2000 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — CORBA 2.4
-
Disposition Summary:
Incorporate changes and close issue.
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT