CORBA24 — Nesting depth in valuetype end tags

Section 15.3.4.5 contains an inconsistency in the description of how end tags
for valuetypes are written. Consider the case where an unchunked value (V)
contains a chunked value (CV1). Should the end tag for CV1 contain a nesting
depth of -2 or -1?

The following sentence in the spec seems to imply that the correct value is -2:

> The end tag is a negative long whose value is the negation of the absolute
> nesting depth of the value type ending at this point in the CDR stream.

However the spec also says:

> The outermost value type will always be terminated by an end tag with a
> value of -1.

which is not true if the end tag for CV1 is written as -2, since no end tag
with a -1 value will be written.

Proposed resolution:

Delete the second above sentence from the spec.

Close with revision using alternative A above.