Legacy Issue Number: 2859
Summary: Just got a question from our IDL compiler folks - I think they"ve
found a bug in the 2.3 IDL chapter..... (actually the bug has been there
for a while)..
Looking at the new CORBA2.3 book,
The syntax for discriminated unions are described on two pages (3-16 and
On both pages the <wchar_type> isn"t included in the grammar for
<switch_type_spec>. Therefore my conclusion was that it shouldn"t be
allowed. The problem is that further down on page 3-36 there is a table
for "case label matching" and in that table wchar is listed as a
So, was the wchar type forgotten from the grammar for switch type spec,
was wchar mistakenly added to the table?
Reported: CORBA 2.3 — Thu, 26 Aug 1999 04:00 GMT
Disposition: Resolved — CORBA 2.4
No Data Available
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT