-
Key: BPMN21-150
-
Legacy Issue Number: 15522
-
Status: open
-
Source: craftware.net ( Eduardo Jara)
-
Summary:
Table 9.14. Row “innerConversationNodeRef”.
In table 9.14 the multiplicity of model association “innerConversationNodeRef” is [0..1], but in Figure 9.31 (p. 139) its multiplicity is [1..1].
Its description in Table 9.14 (“This attribute defines the ConversationNodes of the referenced element...”) suggests that its multiplicity should be [0..*].The multiplicity of “innerConversationNodeRef” should be clearly defined ([0..1], or [1..1], or [0..*]). In case of [0..*] the model association name should be changed to “innerConversationNodeRefs”
---------------------------------------------Table 9.14. Row “outerConversationNodeRef”.
In table 9.14 the multiplicity of model association “outerConversationNodeRef” is [0..*], but in Figure 9.31 (p. 139) its multiplicity is [1..1].
Its description in Table 9.14 (“This attribute defines the ConversationNodes of the parent element...”) suggests that its multiplicity should be [0..*].The multiplicity of “outerConversationNodeRef” should be clearly defined ([1..1], or [0..*]). In case of [0..*] the model association name should be changed to “outerConversationNodeRefs”
Table 9.14 and Figure 9.31 should be updated accordingly.
-
Reported: BPMN 2.0 — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 04:00 GMT
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:57 GMT
BPMN21 — Page 139. Ambiguous multiplicities of associations
- Key: BPMN21-150
- OMG Task Force: BPMN 2.1 RTF