BPMN 2.1 RTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

BPMN21 — Page 139. Ambiguous multiplicities of associations

  • Key: BPMN21-150
  • Legacy Issue Number: 15522
  • Status: open  
  • Source: craftware.net ( Eduardo Jara)
  • Summary:

    Table 9.14. Row “innerConversationNodeRef”.

    In table 9.14 the multiplicity of model association “innerConversationNodeRef” is [0..1], but in Figure 9.31 (p. 139) its multiplicity is [1..1].
    Its description in Table 9.14 (“This attribute defines the ConversationNodes of the referenced element...”) suggests that its multiplicity should be [0..*].

    The multiplicity of “innerConversationNodeRef” should be clearly defined ([0..1], or [1..1], or [0..*]). In case of [0..*] the model association name should be changed to “innerConversationNodeRefs”
    ---------------------------------------------

    Table 9.14. Row “outerConversationNodeRef”.

    In table 9.14 the multiplicity of model association “outerConversationNodeRef” is [0..*], but in Figure 9.31 (p. 139) its multiplicity is [1..1].
    Its description in Table 9.14 (“This attribute defines the ConversationNodes of the parent element...”) suggests that its multiplicity should be [0..*].

    The multiplicity of “outerConversationNodeRef” should be clearly defined ([1..1], or [0..*]). In case of [0..*] the model association name should be changed to “outerConversationNodeRefs”

    Table 9.14 and Figure 9.31 should be updated accordingly.

  • Reported: BPMN 2.0 — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 04:00 GMT
  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:57 GMT