Legacy Issue Number: 2649
Summary: Has the Ada RTF considered the generation of a POA_<interface_name>
package for the Impl side mapping?
This is the approach taken by the C and C++ mappings, and has
the advantage of keeping the Impl package completely free of
code required by the ORB.
Reported: ADA 1.2 — Mon, 10 May 1999 04:00 GMT
Disposition: Resolved — ADA 1.3
This approach was considered during the initial mapping development in 1995. It was
rejected because it would preclude inheritance of a servant type from a servant mapped
from a parent IDL interface, a use case considered much more important than the
advantage cited. The use of “tie” implementations can achieve the cited advantage.
Disposition: Closed, no change
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:57 GMT