${taskforce.name} Avatar
  1. OMG Task Force

Workflow 1.3 RTF — Closed Issues

Open Closed All
Issues resolved by a task force and approved by Board

Issues Descriptions

include sentences are expected

  • Key: WFMF13-3
  • Legacy Issue Number: 2644
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Anonymous
  • Summary:

    Summary: At the beginning of section 2.2, brief IDL description of WorkflowModel
    module are described. In the description, "#include <TimeBase.idl>" is
    expected compared with consolidated IDL. Is it dropped or not mentioned by
    purpose?
    Same things at section 2.15. Followings are expected.
    #include <orb.idl>
    #include <CosNotification.idl>
    #include <CosTransactions.idl>
    #include <CosLifeCycle.idl>
    #include <ObjectIdentity.idl>

  • Reported: WfMF 1.2 — Mon, 10 May 1999 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — WfMF 1.3
  • Disposition Summary:

    Fix IDL. In accordance with issue 2066 resolution.

  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:59 GMT

The usage of exception InvalidResource and CannotChangeRequester

  • Key: WFMF13-2
  • Legacy Issue Number: 2643
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Anonymous
  • Summary:

    Summary: In section 2.8.2 set_assignee() raises InvalidResource exception, and there
    is an explanation about the exception, but it is not defined in section
    2.8.1 and consolidated IDL.
    In section 2.6.1 and 2.6.3, set_requester() raises CannotChangeRequester
    exception, but there is no explanation about the exception and it is not
    defined in consolidated IDL.

    Should these two exceptions be deleted or not?

  • Reported: WfMF 1.2 — Mon, 10 May 1999 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — WfMF 1.3
  • Disposition Summary:

    Add missing IDL statements.

  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:59 GMT

The usage of exceptions regarding WfExecutionObject

  • Key: WFMF13-1
  • Legacy Issue Number: 2642
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Anonymous
  • Summary:

    Summary: In section 2.4.5 and 3.4.1(consolidated IDL) exceptions regarding
    ExecutionObject are defined but there are mismatches between them.

    Operation |exceptions described in 2.4.5 |exceptions described in 3.4.1
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------
    resume() |CannotResume, NotSuspended |CannotResume
    suspend() |CannotSuspend, NotRunning |CannotSuspend,AlreadySuspended
    terminate() |CannotStop, NotRunning | <----
    abort() |CannotStop, NotRunning | <----
    (cf. WfBase::BaseException is omitted)

    What are the correct description?

  • Reported: WfMF 1.2 — Mon, 10 May 1999 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — WfMF 1.3
  • Disposition Summary:

    Fix the inconsistencies.

  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:59 GMT

Typo errors based on consolidated IDL

  • Key: WFMF13-4
  • Legacy Issue Number: 2645
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Anonymous
  • Summary:

    Summary: Resolution:

  • Reported: WfMF 1.2 — Mon, 10 May 1999 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — WfMF 1.3
  • Disposition Summary:

    Fix the IDL where it is different from section 2.4.4

  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:59 GMT