XML Metadata Interchange Avatar
  1. OMG Specification

XML Metadata Interchange — Open Issues

  • Acronym: XMI
  • Issues Count: 3
  • Description: Issues not resolved
Open Closed All
Issues not resolved

Issues Descriptions

XMI Schema Issue - representation for Associations

  • Key: XMI13-3
  • Legacy Issue Number: 5304
  • Status: open  
  • Source: Adaptive ( Mr. Pete Rivett)
  • Summary:

    Association elements are essential for referenceless associations, and can
    be very useful for creating links between existing objects for associations
    with references also (the latter should be optional controlled by a new
    They are not mentioned at all in section 4 (Schema Design Principles)
    despite appearing as Rule Set 10 in 5.2.1. and Rule Set 7 in 5.3.1.

    Also the schema and document generation rules for Association elements are
    unnecessarily heavyweight and inconsistent with the treatment of references
    on classes. For example it does not make sense for an AssociationEnd element
    to have the fixed xmi attributes; and it should be possible to dispense with
    them completely: letting an Association element refer to the linked elements
    using XML attributes. e.g. for association A with ends b and c, a link could
    be represented as follows (b1 and c1 are xmi.id's): <A b=b1 c=c1 />).

  • Reported: XMI 1.2 — Fri, 17 May 2002 04:00 GMT
  • Updated: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 04:37 GMT

Introduce extenderVersion

  • Key: XMI13-2
  • Legacy Issue Number: 4642
  • Status: open  
  • Source: gmail.com ( Barbara Price)
  • Summary:

    4.5.3: It would be useful to have an extenderVersion to match

  • Reported: XMI 1.2 — Tue, 23 Oct 2001 04:00 GMT
  • Updated: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 04:37 GMT

More use of schema structural constraints

  • Key: XMI13-1
  • Legacy Issue Number: 4638
  • Status: open  
  • Source: gmail.com ( Barbara Price)
  • Summary:

    It is not clear why a separate XML construct has not been used for proxies
    (as described in 4.9) - rather than leaving an importer to check for the
    presence of link attributes. And providing no Schema-level enforceable
    constraint that proxies have no content (and vice versa).
    It would also help to have a stronger statement with respect to the use of
    XMI attributes as a 'cache' within proxies: to what extent must they be
    accurate and what options does an importer have if they are not? Does
    validation include checking the accuracy of cached attributes?
    4.6.2: Could Schema mechanisms be used to enforce the constraint that only
    one of href and idref is to be used?

  • Reported: XMI 1.2 — Tue, 23 Oct 2001 04:00 GMT
  • Updated: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 04:37 GMT