SysML-Modelica Transformation Avatar
  1. OMG Specification

SysML-Modelica Transformation — Open Issues

  • Acronym: SyM
  • Issues Count: 2
  • Description: Issues not resolved
Open Closed All
Issues not resolved

Issues Summary

Key Issue Reported Fixed Disposition Status
SYM11-2 level of conformance for uni-directional transformation SyM 1.0b2 open
SYM11-1 figure still uses <> <> and <> applied to lines using the Dependency notation SyM 1.0b2 open

Issues Descriptions

level of conformance for uni-directional transformation

  • Key: SYM11-2
  • Legacy Issue Number: 17245
  • Status: open  
  • Source: Adaptive ( Mr. Pete Rivett)
  • Summary:

    I would have expected a level of conformance for uni-directional transformation – especially given the Overview which refers only to such.
  • Reported: SyM 1.0b2 — Mon, 19 Mar 2012 04:00 GMT
  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT

figure still uses <> <> and <> applied to lines using the Dependency notation

  • Key: SYM11-1
  • Legacy Issue Number: 17219
  • Status: open  
  • Source: Adaptive ( Mr. Pete Rivett)
  • Summary:

    the new figure still uses <<conformsTo>> <<transformation>> and <<instanceOf>> applied to lines using the Dependency notation. These have no defined meaning (either as keywords nor as stereotypes defined either in this specification, SysML or UML). Whatever <<instanceOf>> means it’s not the case that a transformationRecord is an instance of a transformation. If these stereotypes are retained there should be an explanation to say they are purely informal
  • Reported: SyM 1.0b2 — Fri, 9 Mar 2012 05:00 GMT
  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT