Real-time CORBA Avatar
  1. OMG Specification

Real-time CORBA — Closed Issues

  • Acronym: RT
  • Issues Count: 2
  • Description: Issues resolved by a task force and approved by Board
Closed All
Issues resolved by a task force and approved by Board

Issues Summary

Key Issue Reported Fixed Disposition Status
RT12-10 Minor syntax errors in spec RT 1.1 RT 1.2 Resolved closed
RT12-9 PriorityModelPolicy RT 1.1 RT 1.2 Resolved closed

Issues Descriptions

Minor syntax errors in spec

  • Key: RT12-10
  • Legacy Issue Number: 5949
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Objective Interface Systems ( Bill Beckwith)
  • Summary:

    These should be editorial changes:

    Section 2.7.4 Server Declared Priority Model

    ObjectId activate_object_with_priority (
    in PortableServer::Servant p_servant,
    in RTCORBA::Priority priority )
    raises ( ServantAlreadyActive, WrongPolicy );

    Should be:

    PortableServer::POA::ObjectId activate_object_with_priority (
    in PortableServer::Servant p_servant,
    in RTCORBA::Priority priority )
    raises ( PortableServer::POA::ServantAlreadyActive,
    PortableServer::POA::WrongPolicy );

  • Reported: RT 1.1 — Thu, 12 Jun 2003 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — RT 1.2
  • Disposition Summary:

    Accept as specified

  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:51 GMT

PriorityModelPolicy

  • Key: RT12-9
  • Legacy Issue Number: 5613
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: OOMWorks ( Irfan Pyarali)
  • Summary:

    RTCORBA::PriorityModelPolicy cannot be created via ORB::create_policy() method because this policy has two attributes <priority_model> and <server_priority> and the Any that is passed to the ORB::create_policy() method can only hold one parameter. Here is the proposed fix:

    struct PriorityModelParameter

    { PriorityModel priority_model; Priority server_priority; }

    ;

    local interface PriorityModelPolicy : CORBA::Policy

    { readonly attribute PriorityModelParameter value; }

    ;

    RTCORBA::create_priority_model_policy may also need to be changed (for consistency) to accept <PriorityModelParameter> rather than the two parameters separately.

  • Reported: RT 1.1 — Thu, 29 Aug 2002 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — RT 1.2
  • Disposition Summary:

    Closed, no change

  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:51 GMT