UML 2.5 FTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

UML25 — Location p 153 complete_and_disjoint: Complete vs covering?

Open Closed All
  • Key: UML25-339
  • Legacy Issue Number: 17921
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: Change Vision ( Michael Chonoles)
  • Summary:

    Location p 153 complete_and_disjoint: Complete vs covering?
  • Reported: UML 2.4.1 — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — UML 2.5
  • Disposition Summary:

    This is a complaint about the fact the complete and covering are synonyms. But they are clearly defined as synonyms
    in 9.7.3 and the notation uses the word complete while the metamodel uses the word covering. We don’t want to
    change either metamodel or notation.
    Disposition: Closed - No Change
  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:59 GMT