-
Key: UML25-327
-
Legacy Issue Number: 17909
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Soluta.net ( Adriano Comai)
-
Summary:
[AC] Figures 9.23 and 9.24 are, in my opinion, misleading. It seems, based on these examples, that either the generalization set name is shown, or the relative constraints (e.g.
{incomplete, disjoint}), while both could be shown. Same problem in previous figures, from 9.17 to 9.20
-
Reported: UML 2.4.1 — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 2.5
-
Disposition Summary:
There is a law of diminishing returns on this particular section of the specification. Rather than investing
effort on more diagrams, fix this by explicitly stating that any combination of these labels may be shown. -
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:59 GMT
UML25 — Location: 9.7.5 Examples p 134 Generalization Sets
- Key: UML25-327
- OMG Task Force: Unified Modeling Language 2.5 (UML) FTF