UML 2.5 FTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

UML25 — Missing TypedElement

  • Key: UML25-245
  • Legacy Issue Number: 17795
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: INCOSE ( Sanford Friedenthal)
  • Summary:

    Should this figure include a reference from MultiplicityElement to TypedElement, since MultiplicityElement constrains the numbers of values of the TypedElement

  • Reported: UML 2.4.1 — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:00 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — UML 2.5
  • Disposition Summary:

    Presumably the reference is to Figure 7.10, the abstract syntax of types and multiplicity elements. The answer to the
    question is “no”. ConnectorEnd is a MultiplicityElement that is not a TypedElement. In other cases, element metaclass
    specializes bothMultiplicityElement and TypedElement, so no association fromMultiplicityElement to TypedElement
    is needed. The element simply is both a MultiplicityElement and a TypedElement.
    Disposition: Closed - No Change

  • Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:59 GMT