-
Key: UML22-908
-
Legacy Issue Number: 8596
-
Status: closed
-
Source: U. S. Geological Survey ( Jane Messenger)
-
Summary:
The definition of the attribute indicated that multiplicity may be [0..1], yet this is not supported by fig. 446 no by the association ownedEnd:ExtensionEnd[1]. Further, fig 446 does not indicate that the association ownedEnd:ExtensionEnd[1] redefines Association::ownedEnd. Additional Operations [3] says that a lower bound of 1 makes isRequired true, but the statement discussing attributes implies that the lower bound = upper bound. Shouldn't the Additional Operation [3] also indicate this? Notation in fig. 448 does not agree with the text description of the proper notation unless the notation for a MOF model is different than for UML in which case the text should explain that fig. 448 is not a UML notated diagram.
-
Reported: UML 2.0 — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 2.1
-
Disposition Summary:
see above
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT