-
Key: UML22-581
-
Legacy Issue Number: 8029
-
Status: closed
-
Source: NIST ( Mr. Conrad Bock)
-
Summary:
underlined association name Figures 120 and 121 underline the association names, which doesn't seem consistent with the notation for instances in Figure 21.
-
Reported: UML 2.0 — Thu, 30 Dec 2004 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 2.1.2
-
Disposition Summary:
The notation for instance specification seems clear that if an association name is shown on an instance specification, that this name would be underlined, see p.84: “It is not necessary to show an underlined name where it is clear from its connection to instance specifications that it represents a link and not an association.” (The diagram example in that section does not show the name.) Therefore, the above two figures are consistent with the notation defined for instance specifications. One could eliminate the association name, if so desired. Revised Text: Disposition: Closed, no change
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT