-
Key: UML22-359
-
Legacy Issue Number: 11763
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Student at Technische Universität Braunschweig ( Stefan Schulze)
-
Summary:
The constraint [2] in section 12.3.5 on page 325 ("Activity edges may be owned only by activities or groups") of class ActivityEdge seems to be contrary to the fact that inGroup - the only reference between edge and group - is a simple association but no composition or aggregation. According to figures 12.5 and 12.6 I would think, that edges are always owned by activities (composition) and referenced by groups. There is no composition or aggregation that specifies, that edges can be owned by groups. (http://groups.google.de/group/UMLforum/browse_thread/thread/bdd07d113676a41f/20b33a18f90db3d9?#20b33a18f90db3d9
-
Reported: UML 2.1.1 — Thu, 6 Dec 2007 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 2.2
-
Disposition Summary:
This issue has already been resolved by, or no longer applies to, the UML 2.5 Beta 1 specification.
Disposition: Closed - No Change -
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT