-
Key: UML22-177
-
Legacy Issue Number: 9241
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Fulcrum Analytics, Inc. ( Richard Vermillion)
-
Summary:
In the latest XMI file (included as part of Ballot 12) the
ownedParameter attribute of Core::Constructs::Operation redefines
Core::Constructs::BehavioralFeature::ownedParameter – I'm assuming
that this redefinition is a result of the merge of Basic.However, in Operation, the ownedParameter attribute is not ordered.
Since both BehavioralFeature::ownedParameter and
Core::Basic::Operation::ownedParameter are ordered, it seems strange
for Core::Constructs::Operation's not to be ordered. A check of the
drafts and ballots does not seem to address this issue or explain why
it would be the case. Is it a mistake? -
Reported: UML 2.0 — Sun, 15 Jan 2006 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 2.2
-
Disposition Summary:
Infra::Core::
{Basic,Constructs}::Operation::ownedParameter
{isOrdered=true}in UML 2.2 CMOF.
Revised Text:
None.
Disposition: Closed No Change -
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
UML22 — Operation::ownedParameter should be ordered in XMI?
- Key: UML22-177
- OMG Task Force: UML 2.2 RTF