-
Key: UML22-1351
-
Legacy Issue Number: 7433
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Silogic ( Yves BERNARD)
-
Summary:
Figure 52, p107: shouldn't the <<refine>> relationship be reversed ?
-
Reported: UML 2.0 — Mon, 7 Jun 2004 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — UML 2.1
-
Disposition Summary:
This misleading example was removed by the resolution to issue 6173.
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 22:55 GMT
UML22 — Figure 52, p107: shouldn't the <> relationship be reversed ?
- Key: UML22-1351
- OMG Task Force: UML 2.2 RTF