-
Key: UAF14-166
-
Status: open
-
Source: Eclectica Systems Ltd ( Nic Plum)
-
Summary:
Another consequence of the failure within the UAF to distinguish between 'Architecture' and 'Architecture Description' concepts.
The title of the viewpoint (not 'View Specification') is ' - View Specifications::Architecture Management::States::Architecture Status
'Stakeholders: Enterprise Architects, people who want to understand the architecture governance, Technical Managers. Concerns: architecture status.
Definition: captures version number and approval workflow of the architecture. Recommended Implementation: SysML State Machine Diagram, state table, text.
ArchitecturalDescription
status : String [*]
...
Figure 8:5 - Architecture Status'
Figure 8.5 shows the ArchitectureDescription element - NOT any ...Architecture element. It is clear that the viewpoint describes the state of the architecture description not architecture.
Hence NOT 'architecture governance' - should be 'architecture description governance', 'approval workflow of the architecture description', The name of the viewpoint should be 'Architecture Description State' since 'St' = state and the subject is 'Architecture Description' not 'Architecture'
-
Reported: UAF 1.2 — Sat, 13 Apr 2024 19:50 GMT
-
Updated: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 14:57 GMT
UAF14 — 8.1.1 View Specifications::Architecture Management::States::Architecture Status has Nothing to Do with 'Architecture' - It Describes the State of the Architecture Description
- Key: UAF14-166
- OMG Task Force: Unified Architecture Framework (UAF) 1.4 RTF