-
Key: UAF11-34
-
Status: closed
-
Source: INCOSE ( Mr. Matthew Hause)
-
Summary:
Page 43, under Figure 38: Constraint [e] for Implements.supplier says a ResourceConnector implements an OperationalConnector or ResourceConnector? Why? I understand Resource to Operational but why Resource to Resource? If it’s to show different levels of abstraction, then shouldn’t the same be available for Operational to Operational?
-
Reported: UAF 1.0 — Thu, 11 Jan 2018 06:30 GMT
-
Disposition: Closed; No Change — UAF 1.1
-
Disposition Summary:
Needed to support DoDAF SV-2
Resource Connector implementing another Resource Connector is needed to support DoDAF SV-2. Connectors in DoDAF SV-2 are considered to be physical. Connectors in SV-1 are considered to be logical. To show how physical connectors in the SV-2 realise logical connectors in the SV-1 implements relationship is used.
-
Updated: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 17:49 GMT
UAF11 — Inconsistency with Constraint [e] for Implements.supplier
- Key: UAF11-34
- OMG Task Force: Unified Architecture Framework (UAF) 1.1 RTF