-
Key: SYSMLR-84
-
Legacy Issue Number: 16876
-
Status: closed
-
Source: NASA ( Dr. Nicolas F. Rouquette)
-
Summary:
For SysML 1.3, has anyone tried to specify the value of a SysML::ValueType ?
If you haven't done so, please try to do this carefully – i.e., don't just assume that Real x = "42.0" is enough!
You'll realize then that the SysML 1.3 spec doesn't provide the capability to specify the actual value for any of the SysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes
SysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes::Boolean
SysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes::Integer
SysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes::Real
SysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes::StringSince we can't specify the actual real value of a SysML Real, we can't specify the realPart or the imaginaryPart of a SysML Complex number either!
SysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes::Complex::realPart :
SysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes::Complex::imaginaryPartWhat is missing is an actual "value" attribute whose type then must be from the UML PrimitiveTypes library since it's the only capability in UML/SysML we have to specify an actual "value" via the Literal[X] metaclasses in UML.
SysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes::Boolean::value : PrimitiveTypes::Boolean – an actual value can be specified as a UML::LiteralBoolean
SysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes::Integer::value : PrimitiveTypes::Integer – an actual value can be specified as a UML::LiteralInteger
SysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes::Real::value : PrimitiveTypes::Real – an actual value can be specified as a UML::LiteralReal
SysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes::String::value : PrimitiveTypes::String – an actual value can be specified as a UML::LiteralStringSysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes::Complex can remain as-is since it inherits the capability
to specify an actual value for its realPart & imaginaryPart attributes thanks to SysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes::Real::value : PrimitiveTypes::RealI also realized that the QUDV library inconsistently uses in a few places SysML::Libraries::PrimitiveValueTypes when in fact it should use UML's PrimitiveTypes.
I believe that this is a new issue for SysML 1.3.
-
Reported: SysML 1.4 — Mon, 5 Dec 2011 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Deferred — SysML 1.5
-
Disposition Summary:
Defer
Postponed to the next RTF
-
Updated: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:49 GMT
SYSMLR — SysML's PrimitiveValueTypes library is missing "value" properties everywhere
- Key: SYSMLR-84
- OMG Task Force: SysML 1.5 RTF