SYSML17 — SysML 1.6 statement is too strong

SysML says...
“Unless a type of diagram element is shown in some form in one of the SysML diagram elements tables, or in a usage example in one of the normative SysML clauses, it is not considered to be part of the subset of UML included within SysML, even if the UML metamodel packages support additional constructs. For example, SysML imports the entire Dependencies package from UML, but it includes diagram elements for only a subset of the dependency types defined in this package.”

so does that mean all of the actions in common behavior are not there (even though they are explicit included in the tables in the first chapter?)

I think the statement above in SysML does not include everything... if this is what is wanted then UML4SysML needs to be changed to be only the things in the diagrams in the standard...