-
Key: SPECTRA-67
-
Status: open
-
Source: KDM Analytics ( Dr. Nikolai Mansourov)
-
Summary:
Review 16-05-2025
[Specific illustrations suggested for Annex A or elsewhere in SV1 spec]
o One critical thing I feel is missing is demonstrating who SPECTRA expects data types and data flows to be modeled (along with channels).
o There are no example documentation or diagrams currently for how to “mark” activity diagrams and sequence diagrams.
o I would like to see some of those to properly assess how SPECTRA expects those to work with its stereotype implementation.
o An example and better explanation for SPECTRA “domains” implementation should also be added as I did not have a clear understanding of their feasibility based on the specification alone.
o It doesnt really explain why they create proprietary stereotypes that already seem to be fulfilled by the tool itself. Example “Subsystem”.
o Lacked any information in general about the Stereotypes themselves. -
Reported: SPECTRA 1.0a1 — Mon, 21 Jul 2025 15:40 GMT
-
Updated: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 15:40 GMT