SFPM 1.0b2 FTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

SFPM_ — Clarify the use of SBVR for defining SFPs

Open Closed All
  • Key: SFPM_-9
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: KDM Analytics ( Dr. Nikolai Mansourov)
  • Summary:

    From AB Review by Pete Rivett, March 17, 2020:
    I don’t understand the purpose of replicating chunks of SBVR (in 9.4, 9.5), or even why vocabularies would be needed for Software Patterns. If they’re structural in nature why the need to link them to a conceptual model? It should at most be an optional compliance point.

    The use of SBVR seems an odd choice for something that is intended to be first order logic and executable (mentioned elsewhere), since SBVR is neither of those, and it would be necessary to define a subset. Why not use ODM?
  • Reported: SFPM 1.0b1 — Tue, 15 Feb 2022 04:43 GMT
  • Disposition: Closed; No Change — SFPM 1.0b2
  • Disposition Summary:

    no need to further clarify

    SBVR is a relevant OMG specification that includes the subset needed for the purposes of SFP. The normative reference to SBVR is made so that semantic formulation elements are not re-defined in this specification.
  • Updated: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 22:27 GMT