SFPM 1.0b2 FTF Avatar
  1. OMG Issue

SFPM_ — Provide justification for the non-normative "readable" notation for SFPs

Open Closed All
  • Key: SFPM_-7
  • Status: closed  
  • Source: KDM Analytics ( Dr. Nikolai Mansourov)
  • Summary:

    From AB review by Pete Rivett, March 17, 2020:
    The spec in Appendix A seems to introduce its own Human Usable Textual Notation, ignoring the (admittedly dated) OMG standard. And with no description or justification.
    Reference should be made to the CFG syntax used.
    Though the readable text spec is non-normative it is made use of extensively in the normative sections.
  • Reported: SFPM 1.0b1 — Tue, 15 Feb 2022 04:40 GMT
  • Disposition: Resolved — SFPM 1.0b2
  • Disposition Summary:

    use reference to the EBNF in W3C specification of xml

    The "readable SFP language" uses EBNF from the W3C specification of XML. The document is already in normative references.
  • Updated: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 22:27 GMT