-
Key: SDO11-22
-
Legacy Issue Number: 6585
-
Status: open
-
Source: Hitachi Ltd,. ( Ken-ichiroh Kawakami)
-
Summary:
The meaning of the term might be completely unclear to 3rd party persons. Can we do without using this term? Do we really need SDOSystemElement? One of the reasons for having SDOSystemElement is to allow non-SDOs to participate in the Organisation. Is it correct? If so, then if we decide to get rid of the term non-sdo then probably we do not need SDOSystemElement as well. At least, the term ‘non-SDO’ should be changed.
-
Reported: SDO 1.0 — Mon, 10 Nov 2003 05:00 GMT
-
Updated: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:15 GMT
SDO11 — Do we really need SDOSystemElement
- Key: SDO11-22
- OMG Task Force: Super Distributed Objects 1.1 RTF