Source: Trisotech ( Ron Ross)
Page 8 currently includes the following Note.
Note: As indicated in 2.4.1, an SBVR producer may produce instances of concepts not defined in SBVR as well. In such a case, the SBVR fact model would be only a part of the exchange document.
SBVR proper does not use the term “fact model”. The second sentence of the Note should probably read as follows:
“In such a case, the instances of concepts specified in the SBVR XMI Metamodel XML Schema (Clause 25.3) would be only a part of the exchange document.”
Reported: SBVR 1.4 — Tue, 16 Apr 2019 17:49 GMT
Disposition: Resolved — SBVR 1.5
Replaced "fact model" wording with appropriate wording to clarify sentence
see attached Word document
Updated: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 17:48 GMT
- SBVR-Issue 15-143 Inappropriate Use of 'Fact model'.docx 36 kB (application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document)
SBVR15 — Inappropriate Use of “Fact Model”
- Key: SBVR15-143
- OMG Task Force: SBVR 1.5 RTF