SACM21 — Concepts in SACM 2 have no direct graphical notation

Need a concrete syntax for the Argumentation metamodel that can represent the semantic definitions of the elements for semantic transparency, easing the burden of learning the elements and allowing them to be perceived directly from the notation.

Concrete Syntax and Graphical notation

As a result of the work by a graduate student at University of York - which was presented in draft at the March and September meetings we now have a proposed graphical notation for the Argumentation portions of SACM. The proposed revisions to the last part of Section 1 to add this to the history of SACM, along with a new compliance point (2.6) for those choosing to support the notation, update to section 5 on symbols, and the specific notations in many parts of section 11, as well as examples in the new Annex C are provided.