SACM11 — "ArgumentResoning" Class and "Assertedinferce" Class

According to "ArgumentResoning" Class and "Assertedinferce" Class on the SACM 1.0 spec,

>ArgumentReasoning can be used to provide additional description or explanation
>of the asserted inference or challenge that connects one or more Claims (premises)
>to another Claim (conclusion). ArgumentReasoning elements are therefore
>related to AssertedInferences and AssertedChallenges

and

>The AssertedInference association class records the inference that
>a user declares to exist between one or more Assertion
>(premises) and another Assertion (conclusion).

It seems that AsseretedInference and AssertedChallenges implies
strategy(Parallelogram) on the GSN.

On the other hand, in "B.2.1 Goal Structuring Notation(GSN) Examples" in Annex B
Parallelogram corresponds to ArgumentReasoning.

These are confusing.
Which one is correct?

Clarify the above.

Duplicate of SR-84

This issue is a duplicate of SR-84 - somehow it was added into JIRA twice.