Legacy Issue Number: 19544
Source: Architecture Technology Institute ( Hiroshi Miyazaki)
According to "ArgumentResoning" Class and "Assertedinferce" Class on the SACM 1.0 spec,
>ArgumentReasoning can be used to provide additional description or explanation
>of the asserted inference or challenge that connects one or more Claims (premises)
>to another Claim (conclusion). ArgumentReasoning elements are therefore
>related to AssertedInferences and AssertedChallenges
>The AssertedInference association class records the inference that
>a user declares to exist between one or more Assertion
>(premises) and another Assertion (conclusion).
It seems that AsseretedInference and AssertedChallenges implies
strategy(Parallelogram) on the GSN.
On the other hand, in "B.2.1 Goal Structuring Notation(GSN) Examples" in Annex B
Parallelogram corresponds to ArgumentReasoning.
These are confusing.
Which one is correct?
Clarify the above.
Reported: SACM 1.0 — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 04:00 GMT
Disposition: Closed; No Change — SACM 1.1
Updated: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 01:16 GMT
SACM11 — "ArgumentResoning" Class and "Assertedinferce" Class
- Key: SACM11-44
- OMG Task Force: SACM 1.1 RTF