-
Key: SACM-17
-
Legacy Issue Number: 16516
-
Status: closed
-
Source: MITRE ( Mr. Samuel Redwine)
-
Summary:
For example, a ResultsAssertion may be detailed in only a portion or portions of an artifact (or artifacts). Whether mapped via an Artifact or not, how are this or these linked to so that the scope is clear? A means is needed.
-
Reported: ARM 1.0b1 — Thu, 25 Aug 2011 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — SACM 1.0b2
-
Disposition Summary:
If you need to reference a portioned item, you need an artifact. Can use tagged values and annotation to
include other referencing information No further action planned The relationship between the artefact and
the EvidenceAssertion is made clear by the association. REJECT.
The SACM Evidence Metamodel provides more detailed solution.
Disposition: Closed, no change -
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
SACM — Linking to Portions of an Artifact if this is what is Represented by a Model Element
- Key: SACM-17
- OMG Task Force: Structured Assurance Case Metamodel (SACM) FTF