-
Key: SACM-161
-
Legacy Issue Number: 16867
-
Status: closed
-
Source: MITRE ( Mr. Samuel Redwine)
-
Summary:
Question of how to characterize the identity of the “artifact-as-such”, as well as
its URN. May need a “name” attribute for the “source” class (Issue raised). Perhaps defer or
explain usage in the document? -
Reported: SACM 1.0b1 — Thu, 1 Dec 2011 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — SACM 1.0b2
-
Disposition Summary:
This issue is a duplicate of 16515; a resolution is provided by 17347. SACM uses a URL in both the
Argumentation Metamodel as well as in the Evidence Metamodel. Evidence Metamodel also includes a
name. Annotations can be used to provide further clarifications. There is also a gid+id mechanism, so each
organization can use a unique reference schema for their exhibits and artifacts.
Disposition: Closed, no change -
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
SACM — Question of how to characterize the identity of the “artifact-as-such”, as well as its URN
- Key: SACM-161
- OMG Task Force: Structured Assurance Case Metamodel (SACM) FTF