SACM — Using the term 'Argument' as the container for the "Claims-Argument-Evidence" aspect of ARM is confusing as people expec

Using the term 'Argument' as the container for the "Claims-Argument-Evidence" aspect of ARM is confusing as people expect to see Claim first.

Heading -> Rename to “Argumentation Class”
Para 1, 2nd word -> rename to “Argumentation”
Associations section -> rename association “containsArgumentLink” into
containsArgumentation" The nested Argumentation contained in a given instance of an
Argumentation.
Semantics section, first sentence -> delete “and ArgumentLinks between
ArgumentElements”
Semantics section add after 1st sentence: "Argumentation elements can be nested."
Section 9.2.9 Claim Class
First para, first sentence -> change “structured Argument.” to “structured
Argumentation”
Edit section 9.2.8. CitationElement as follows:
change the 1st sentence from " The CitationElement Class cites an Argument, or an
ArgumentElement within another Argument, for use within an Argument"
into
The CitationElement Class cites an Argumentation, or an ArgumentElement within
another Argumentation, for use within the current Argumentation.
in subsection Associations change 'refersToArgument:Argument[0..1] into
"refersToArgumentation:Argumentation[0..*] References to Argumentation.
change 'refersToArgumentElement;ArgumentElement[0..1] into
"refersToArgumentElement:ArgumnetElement[0..*]
Replace Argumentation Metamodel diagram Figure 9.1 according to the new Figure 9.1
in related resolution 17347 that addresses other model improvements. change the semantics subsection from:
Within an Argument (package) it can be useful to be able to cite elements of an
Argument (i.e., ArgumentElements) to act as explicit proxies for those elements acting
within the argument structure. For example, in supporting a Claim it may be useful to
cite a Claim or InformationElement declared within another Argument. It can also be
useful to be able to cite entire Arguments. For example, in supporting a Claim it may be
useful to cite an existing (structured) Argument.
into
Within an Argumentation (package) it can be useful to be able to cite elements of an
Argumentation (i.e., ArgumentElements) to act as explicit proxies for those elements
acting within the argumentation structure. For example, in supporting a Claim it may be
useful to cite a Claim or InformationElement declared within another Argumentation. It
can also be useful to be able to cite entire Argumentationss. For example, in supporting a
Claim it may be useful to cite an existing (structured) Argumentation.