-
Key: SACM-149
-
Legacy Issue Number: 16848
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Adelard LLP ( Luke Emmet)
-
Summary:
If AssertedRelationships are genuinely Assertions then they should be subtypes of Assertion
-
Reported: SACM 1.0b1 — Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — SACM 1.0b2
-
Disposition Summary:
Related issue: 16852 (id=145)
The agreed resolution is that asserted relationships to be moved to be a sub class of
assertion, and to remove abstract class “ArgumentLink”. Update the text to reflect that
the “toBeSupported” attribute attaches to the Claim class (as shown in the diagram).
This issue is resolved as part of the accumulated model changes addressed by 17347.
Disposition: Merged -
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
SACM — If AssertedRelationships are genuinely Assertions then they should be subtypes of Assertion
- Key: SACM-149
- OMG Task Force: Structured Assurance Case Metamodel (SACM) FTF