-
Key: OCL21-255
-
Legacy Issue Number: 8626
-
Status: closed
-
Source: U. S. Geological Survey ( Jane Messenger)
-
Summary:
The example using Bike and Car as two separate subtypes of Transport does not make any mention of Set(Car), Bag(car), or Collection(Car). Either delete reference to Car as a separate subtype of Transport or add some comments about a collection of some sort of Car conforming (and not conforming) to some other collection. I may be confused, but the statement "Note that Set(Bicycle) does not conform to Bag(Bicycle)" does not make a lot of sense to me. Wouldn't it be better to say that "Set(Bicycle) does not conform to Bag(car)?"
-
Reported: OCL 2.0b2 — Thu, 24 Mar 2005 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — OCL 2.1
-
Disposition Summary:
Yes the words can be a little clearer
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT