-
Key: NOT12-8
-
Legacy Issue Number: 2220
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Anonymous
-
Summary:
Summary: Issue: No explicit statement is given in the contraint grammar about
which operators apply to enumerated types.Suggested solution:
Only equality and inequality operators (== != >= > < <=) should be
defined as legal on enums... as these are all that CORBA requires are
available in a language mapping. -
Reported: NOT 1.1 — Wed, 18 Nov 1998 05:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — NOT 1.2
-
Disposition Summary:
fix see below
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
NOT12 — Explicit statement missing in contraint grammar
- Key: NOT12-8
- OMG Task Force: Notification Service 1.2 RTF