-
Key: NOT11-16
-
Legacy Issue Number: 1682
-
Status: closed
-
Source: Anonymous
-
Summary:
Summary: In section 2.4.6 of the Notification Spec, there"s a discussion about
positional notation wrt to unions. Examples are given using the
constraints of the form $.(nn). e.g.,
$.(3).2 < 128However, this isn"t syntactically correct. the Compdot syntactic
category is given as:<CompDot> := <CompIdent> | <CompPos> | ** the "_" literals **
<CompIdent> must begin with an <Ident> which must begin with an
aphabetic char.
<CompPos> must begin with a digit.<Component> may be empty, in which case an operator like +,-, and, or,
etc will be expected, but not a "(".
The same mistake is made throughout Section 2.4.6, in the fifth,
sixth, and seventh paragraphs. There are also some comments such as "
.. using run time variables as "$(3).2 < 128" .." in the fifth
paragraph that don"t make sense. (That example is wrong because a
runtime variables must be introduced by $<Ident>.) -
Reported: NOT 1.0.1 — Wed, 15 Jul 1998 04:00 GMT
-
Disposition: Resolved — NOT 1.1
-
Disposition Summary:
No Data Available
-
Updated: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 20:58 GMT
NOT11 — Section 2.4.6 : positional notation wrt to unions
- Key: NOT11-16
- OMG Task Force: Notification Service RTF